The case laws on temporary resicence ordinance 2015 Diaries

Также здесь представлены профилактических мерах, актуальных подходах и рекомендациях специалистов.

The court emphasized that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity of the offense demands the most stringent punishment, taking into consideration the sanctity of human life and deterrence for potential offenders.

Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually well-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety days. If your appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then approach the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the 90 times for the department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we're guided with the decision on the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It is usually a properly-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.

be founded without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will here be inferred. This is usually a horrifying reality, an extremely minimal threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.

There are innumerable situations where death was never intended – even more where People nominated during the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of the human being is a tragic event. However the death of any living being is no fewer a tragic event.

Accessing free case law sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and any individual seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.

When the petitioner is solely present with the place of incidence without causing any injury on the deceased or PWs then in these kinds of circumstances, whether he is vicariously liable shall be decided because of the figured out trial Court after recording of your evidence.

Thus, it had been held that the right to your healthy environment was part of the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article nine and fourteen from the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all facets of human existence, all these kinds of amenities and facilities that a person is entitled to get pleasure from with dignity, legally and constitutionally.

To invoke section three hundred and 302 just because death has occurred is the biggest tragedy of all. It does the exact opposite of what a legal system is there to carry out, i.e. secure its citizens.

share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property also can sold to another co-owner/co-sharer as well as to an stranger and section forty four(Transfer of Property Act 1882)

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary on the determination of your current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]